Because of organizational and struc

Because of organizational and structural changes over the past century that largely affected the work of women, we also investigated cohort differences by gender. We were able to obtain effect sizes for women and men up to the 1960s. Samples in the 1970s and the 1980s did not report stability coefficients separately for men and women. As indicated in Table 4, both men and women evidenced cohort trends that mirrored the overall trend. Present findings for cohort trends broken down by gender must be interpreted with caution because of the attenuation of samples and sample sizes for the more recent cohorts. Nonetheless, the close resemblance of both trends to each other and to the overall trend (which included mixed-gender samples) suggests that the overall trend is representative of both genders. Initial testing age, test– retest interval, and coefficient type were found to be the only significant moderators in the cohort-based aggregation. The overall trend as well as the trends for men and women remained unchanged after we controlled for all three moderators.
Gender. Congruent with gender’s lack of a significant moderating effect on the age trajectory of interests, there were no significant differences between the population estimates for samples of men and women (see Table 5). Longitudinal studies of men and women obtained the same level of interest stability at .58. Age, test–retest interval, and coefficient types were the only significant moderators of interest stability between men and women (see Table 3). No differences emerged between population estimates for both groups of studies after we controlled for age and test–retest interval in an analysis that excluded profile correlations.
Scale generality. Although scale generality was not a significant moderator within the age trajectory, there were significant

Results (Indonesian) 1:

Karena perubahan organisasi dan struktural selama abad yang mempengaruhi sebagian besar pekerjaan perempuan, kami juga diselidiki kohort perbedaan oleh jenis kelamin. Kami mampu untuk mendapatkan efek ukuran untuk perempuan dan laki-laki hingga 1960-an. Sampel di 1970-an dan 1980-an tidak melaporkan stabilitas koefisien secara terpisah untuk pria dan wanita. Seperti yang ditunjukkan dalam tabel 4, baik pria maupun wanita dibuktikan kohort tren yang dicerminkan keseluruhan tren. Temuan-temuan yang hadir untuk tren kohort dipecah oleh jenis kelamin harus ditafsirkan dengan hati-hati karena redaman sampel dan sampel ukuran untuk kohort lebih baru. Meskipun demikian, kemiripan kedua tren untuk satu sama lain dan tren keseluruhan (yang termasuk sampel dicampur gender) menunjukkan bahwa keseluruhan tren adalah wakil dari kedua jenis kelamin. Usia pengujian awal, tes-tes ulang interval, dan jenis koefisien ditemukan untuk menjadi moderator hanya signifikan di agregasi berbasis kohort. Kecenderungan keseluruhan serta tren untuk pria dan wanita tetap tidak berubah setelah kami dikontrol untuk semua tiga moderator.Gender. Congruent with gender’s lack of a significant moderating effect on the age trajectory of interests, there were no significant differences between the population estimates for samples of men and women (see Table 5). Longitudinal studies of men and women obtained the same level of interest stability at .58. Age, test–retest interval, and coefficient types were the only significant moderators of interest stability between men and women (see Table 3). No differences emerged between population estimates for both groups of studies after we controlled for age and test–retest interval in an analysis that excluded profile correlations.Scale generality. Although scale generality was not a significant moderator within the age trajectory, there were significant