Lecturing has been criticized for f

Lecturing has been criticized for fostering a passive learning environment, emphasizing a one-way flow of
information, and not adequately engaging students. In contrast, active-learning approaches, such as teambased
learning (TBL), prioritize student interaction and engagement and create multidirectional flows
of information. This paper presents an exploratory analysis of whether lecturing or TBL was better for
teaching content; developing skills, such as critical thinking; and creating an enjoyable learning environment
in a sociology course. Results showed few differences in these outcomes between groups taught with
the two different methods, although TBL students thought they improved their oral communication and
creative thinking skills more than the lecture students, and they reported getting to know their professor
and classmates more than did the lecture students.

Results (Indonesian) 2:

Perkuliahan telah dikritik karena membina lingkungan belajar pasif, menekankan aliran satu arah
informasi, dan tidak cukup melibatkan siswa. Sebaliknya, pendekatan pembelajaran aktif, seperti teambased
belajar (TBL), memprioritaskan interaksi siswa dan keterlibatan dan menciptakan arus multiarah
informasi. Makalah ini menyajikan analisis eksplorasi apakah kuliah atau TBL lebih baik untuk
konten mengajar; mengembangkan keterampilan, seperti berpikir kritis; dan menciptakan lingkungan belajar yang menyenangkan
di lapangan sosiologi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan beberapa perbedaan hasil tersebut antara kelompok diajarkan dengan
dua metode yang berbeda, meskipun siswa TBL pikir mereka meningkatkan komunikasi lisan dan
keterampilan berpikir kreatif lebih dari siswa kuliah, dan mereka melaporkan untuk mengenal profesor mereka
dan teman sekelas yang lebih daripada kuliah siswa.