- Text
- History
5 Benin 15 Botswana 10 Chile 6 Colo
5
Benin
15
Botswana
10
Chile
6
Colombia
10
5
4
0
5
0
0
–5
2
0
–5
1940
1960
1980
2000
–5
1940
1960
1980
2000
–10
1940
1960
1980
2000
–2
1940
1960
1980
2000
20
Cyprus
5
Ghana
5
Guinea
10
Guinea-Bissau
10
0
0
–5
0
5
0
–5
–10
1940
1960
1980
2000
–10
1940
1960
1980
2000
–5
1940
1960
1980
2000
–10
1940
1960
1980
2000
10
Guyana
10
Hungary
10
Indonesia
10
Israel
0
–10
5
0
5
0
5
0
–20
1940
1960
1980
2000
–5
1940
1960
1980
2000
–5
1940
1960
1980
2000
–5
1940
1960
1980
2000
20
Jordan
10
Korea, Republic of
10
5
Mali
15
10
Mauritius
10
0
5
0
0
–5
5
0
–10
1940
1960
1980
2000
–5
1940
1960
1980
2000
–10
1940
1960
1980
2000
–5
1940
1960
1980
2000
10
Mexico
10
Paraguay
10
Philippines
10
Poland
5
0
5
0
5
0
–5
5
0
–5
–5
1940
1960
1980
2000
–5
1940
1960
1980
2000
–10
1940
1960
1980
2000
–10
1940
1960
1980
2000
10
Taiwan
10
Tunisia
20
Uganda
10
Uruguay
8
6
4
5
0
10
0
5
0
–5
2
1940
1960
1980
2000
–5
1940
1960
1980
2000
–10
1940
1960
1980
2000
–10
1940
1960
1980
2000
3-year MA of Growth
Average Growth (after Trade Liberalization)
Average Growth (before Trade Liberalization)
Date of Liberatization
F I G U R E 9 . 7 Impact of trade liberalization on economic growth. On average, trade liberalization increases
GDP growth but not always. Source: Wacziarg and Welch, Trade Liberalization and Growth: New
Evidence NBER Working Paper 10152 (2003).
is not surprising that increased trade does not systematically affect inequality. When
countries trade more, some sectors expand and others contract. If poor people work in
the sector that expands, then inequality will decline; if they are based in the sector that
contracts, then inequality will rise. This pattern can be seen clearly in Figure 9.8—trade
liberalization often has a marked impact on inequality, sometimes for the better and
sometimes for the worse. Therefore, while trade liberalization will frequently benefit
0/5000
5 Benin 15 Botswana 10 Chile 6 Colombia 10 5 4 0 50 0–5 20 –51940 1960 1980 2000 –51940 1960 1980 2000 –101940 1960 1980 2000 –21940 1960 1980 2000 20 Cyprus 5 Ghana 5 Guinea 10 Guinea-Bissau 100 0–5 0 50–5 –101940 1960 1980 2000 –101940 1960 1980 2000 –51940 1960 1980 2000 –101940 1960 1980 2000 10 Guyana 10 Hungary 10 Indonesia 10 Israel 0–10 50 50 50 –201940 1960 1980 2000 –51940 1960 1980 2000 –51940 1960 1980 2000 –51940 1960 1980 2000 20 Jordan 10 Korea, Republic of 105 Mali 1510 Mauritius 100 50 0–5 50 –101940 1960 1980 2000 –51940 1960 1980 2000 –101940 1960 1980 2000 –51940 1960 1980 2000 10 Mexico 10 Paraguay 10 Philippines 10 Poland 50 50 50–5 50–5 –51940 1960 1980 2000 –51940 1960 1980 2000 –101940 1960 1980 2000 –101940 1960 1980 2000 10 Taiwan 10 Tunisia 20 Uganda 10 Uruguay 864 50 100 50–5 21940 1960 1980 2000 –51940 1960 1980 2000 –101940 1960 1980 2000 –101940 1960 1980 2000 3-year MA of GrowthAverage Growth (after Trade Liberalization) Average Growth (before Trade Liberalization)Date of Liberatization F I G U R E 9 . 7 Impact of trade liberalization on economic growth. On average, trade liberalization increasesGDP growth but not always. Source: Wacziarg and Welch, Trade Liberalization and Growth: NewEvidence NBER Working Paper 10152 (2003).is not surprising that increased trade does not systematically affect inequality. Whencountries trade more, some sectors expand and others contract. If poor people work inthe sector that expands, then inequality will decline; if they are based in the sector thatcontracts, then inequality will rise. This pattern can be seen clearly in Figure 9.8—tradeliberalization often has a marked impact on inequality, sometimes for the better andsometimes for the worse. Therefore, while trade liberalization will frequently benefit
Being translated, please wait..
Other languages
The translation tool support: Afrikaans, Albanian, Amharic, Arabic, Armenian, Azerbaijani, Basque, Belarusian, Bengali, Bosnian, Bulgarian, Catalan, Cebuano, Chichewa, Chinese, Chinese Traditional, Corsican, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Detect language, Dutch, English, Esperanto, Estonian, Filipino, Finnish, French, Frisian, Galician, Georgian, German, Greek, Gujarati, Haitian Creole, Hausa, Hawaiian, Hebrew, Hindi, Hmong, Hungarian, Icelandic, Igbo, Indonesian, Irish, Italian, Japanese, Javanese, Kannada, Kazakh, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Klingon, Korean, Kurdish (Kurmanji), Kyrgyz, Lao, Latin, Latvian, Lithuanian, Luxembourgish, Macedonian, Malagasy, Malay, Malayalam, Maltese, Maori, Marathi, Mongolian, Myanmar (Burmese), Nepali, Norwegian, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Punjabi, Romanian, Russian, Samoan, Scots Gaelic, Serbian, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovak, Slovenian, Somali, Spanish, Sundanese, Swahili, Swedish, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turkish, Turkmen, Ukrainian, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnamese, Welsh, Xhosa, Yiddish, Yoruba, Zulu, Language translation.
- learn how the country was united?
- Sản phẩm có thể mạnh còn là sản phẩm mỹ
- nói sự thật thì thế này thế kia cnn
- Located on the "Patthanakan road" betwee
- See one of the nation's largest collecti
- поздняя регистрация заезда проводится то
- I haven't
- Located on the "Patthanakan road" betwee
- vogelhuisje
- Ja währe schön du bist sooo toole frau
- หลักการใช้ Infinitive with to
- promote
- Dit gesprek kan worden opgenomen voor tr
- поздняя регистрация заезда проводится то
- cost stickiness
- Located on the "Patthanakan road" betwee
- He is a consummate performer
- 2 - 4pm: Saigon Swing Cats special works
- resolved
- learn about the customs of the country?
- ความรู้ไม่มีคำว่าสาย
- tomorrow what time you work
- Located on the "Patthanakan road" betwee
- ฉันกำลังทำอาหารคำ่อยู่
