Results (
Thai) 1:
[Copy]Copied!
Because stigma research (particularly intervention research) is immature, it is important that promising studies with less evidence be considered in literature reviews (Collins & Fauser, 2005). A random sampling of publications was used to capture avariety of stigma research opposed to a limited view that was investigator biased (Fink, 2005).Most of the articles yielded from the search were found in psychology, psychiatry, and nursing and discussed the consequences of stigma. Most of the research has been nonexperimental, correlational, and qualitative in design. Qualitative and nonexperimental research is valuable and contributes to the science by providing a greater understanding of the stigma and its associated variables. However, these methods of inquiry do not directly translate into effective stigma interventions. Few intervention studies have been conducted in the United States (particularly with adolescents and youth). Most of the studies have been conducted in the United Kingdom and Australia.
Being translated, please wait..