semanticist, on the other hand, is

semanticist, on the other hand, is more inclined than the ordinary
dictionary-writer to leave some terms undefined. Such undefined terms are
called semantic primes. The nearest equivalent in the ordinary dictionary to
the semanticist’s idea of undefined semantic primes is the use of rather
technical, even sometimes abstruse, terms in its definitions.
Practice Go through the dictionary sample above and make a list of about seven or
eight words used in the definitions that have a rather technical or academic
flavour, words whose meanings uneducated people would perhaps not know.
Write out your list in order of remoteness from ordinary language.
................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................
Feedback Our list would be as follows: fecundate, genus, Homo, pistil, stamens,
procreate, beget, hermaphrodite.
Comment The use of such technical terms can be seen as an attempt to break out of the
circularity which we have noted: an attempt to define the words of ordinary
language in another language, e.g. Latin in the case of Homo (which is the
Latin word for man), or the technical language of science, as in the case of
fecundate. This is not a strategy which the descriptive semanticist adopts.
But the descriptive semanticist’s dictionary does use a few technical devices
specifically designed (by semanticists) for the purpose of describing meaning.
Beside some undefined semantic primes, the main technical device used is
the framework of logic, with its notation using 1, &, etc. and a small set
of technical semantic terms, like hyponym, clearly defined within this
logical framework.We will introduce further such terms gradually in
subsequent units.
In connection with the use of technical language in ordinary dictionaries,
we mention that they operate a small bias in favour of educated usage. This
educated bias of dictionaries should not lead to misunderstanding about the
nature of the semanticist’s task.We, just as the ordinary dictionary-writer, are
concerned with describing meaning, and not with prescribing meaning (that
is, we are not concerned with making value judgements about any aspects of
meaning). Academic semanticists tend to be well-educated people, and most
speak a language in which, for example, both bird and mammal are hyponyms
of animal. Semanticists aim to describe the sense relations between predicates,
as they understand them, in their own everyday language.
There is one notable area in which descriptive semanticists are prepared to
abandon ordinary language and to allow a few terms which do not actually
occur in the language to be regarded as predicates entering into sense
relations with other, actually occurring, predicates.We explain this below.

Results (Indonesian) 1:

semanticist, on the other hand, is more inclined than the ordinarydictionary-writer to leave some terms undefined. Such undefined terms arecalled semantic primes. The nearest equivalent in the ordinary dictionary tothe semanticist’s idea of undefined semantic primes is the use of rathertechnical, even sometimes abstruse, terms in its definitions.Practice Go through the dictionary sample above and make a list of about seven oreight words used in the definitions that have a rather technical or academicflavour, words whose meanings uneducated people would perhaps not know.Write out your list in order of remoteness from ordinary language.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................Feedback Our list would be as follows: fecundate, genus, Homo, pistil, stamens,procreate, beget, hermaphrodite.Comment The use of such technical terms can be seen as an attempt to break out of thecircularity which we have noted: an attempt to define the words of ordinarylanguage in another language, e.g. Latin in the case of Homo (which is theLatin word for man), or the technical language of science, as in the case offecundate. This is not a strategy which the descriptive semanticist adopts.But the descriptive semanticist’s dictionary does use a few technical devicesspecifically designed (by semanticists) for the purpose of describing meaning.Beside some undefined semantic primes, the main technical device used isthe framework of logic, with its notation using 1, &, etc. and a small setistilah teknis yang semantik, seperti hyponym, yang jelas dalam hal inikerangka kerja yang logis. Kami akan memperkenalkan lebih lanjut istilah-istilah seperti bertahap dalamunit berikutnya.Sehubungan dengan penggunaan teknis bahasa dalam kamus biasa,kami menyebutkan bahwa mereka beroperasi kecil bias mendukung penggunaan berpendidikan. Iniberpendidikan bias Kamus tidak menyebabkan kesalahpahaman mengenaisifat semanticist tugas. Kami, seperti biasa Kamus-penulis, adalahprihatin dengan menjelaskan makna, dan bukan dengan resep berarti (bahwaadalah, kita tidak peduli dengan membuat nilai penilaian tentang setiap aspekberarti). Akademik semanticists cenderung menjadi orang-orang terdidik, dan sebagianberbicara bahasa di mana, misalnya, burung dan mamalia hyponymshewan. Semanticists bertujuan untuk menggambarkan rasa hubungan antara predikat,karena mereka mengerti mereka, dalam bahasa mereka sendiri sehari-hari.Ada satu bidang yang terkenal di mana deskriptif semanticists siap untukmeninggalkan bahasa biasa dan memungkinkan beberapa istilah yang tidak benar-benarterjadi dalam bahasa harus dianggap sebagai predikat memasuki rasahubungan dengan predikat lain, benar-benar terjadi. Kami menjelaskan hal ini di bawah ini.