I was told that during their counter complaint, Lockheed had recently paid an amount to an escrow account in order to alleviate their housing responsibility after being directed to pay near the time they chose to evict.
42. On Aug 31, 2016, I returned to the Mayzad Court for the 3rd time to be asked why was I was objecting to Lockheed's settlement and what I wanted from them. Again I gave them the same document form the courts that states what my complaint was and what Im asking for. I have given this document to the Mayzad Courts 3 separate times and Lockheed Martin's agents already know what my original objections were considering my Labor Court case upcoming on September 5. When I mentioned my estimate of the additional civil damages incurred on top of the original approximately $300,000 USD minor labor dispute based on losing my continued employment until the year 2021 is additionally valued at over $230,000 USD per year in lost wages and benefits, both Lockheed Martin representatives and the manager at the arbitration section unprofessionally laughed at the amount I attempted to give as a rough estimate. They would not accept that I wish for the judge to see my case and evidence and produce a fair settlement and insisted on a dollar amount.
43. On Sep 5, 2016 I went to the Mazyad Court as requested and was told the Lockheed Martin again requested more time to answer my objections in the labor court dispute case #2016-243. This is while Lockheed simultaneously complains to the emergency courts on the appeal s 2016-210 on Aug 3 2016 and appeal 2016-410 on Aug 28 2016 ruling for Lockheed to continue the housing lease on case # 2016-3720 saying that the labor courts are taking too long to make a decision. The case will be heard next on Sept 22, 2016 will causing more financial damages on my end.