Results (
Indonesian) 1:
[Copy]Copied!
TSþþ extends TSþ with the addition that the cocoa farmers,when packing the cocoa beans, already mark all bags with uniquecodes and date. In this case the finished chocolate is traceable up tothe individual cocoa farmer. Alternatively, the local buying stationcould mark the bags at arrival, with the information of the farmerdelivering the beans.In Fig. 3 the different traceability systems can be seen.3.3.3. Different product recallsThe simulation model is able to simulate two possible foodcrises and corresponding recalls (R1 and R2) that could occur in thecase study supply chain. R1 simulates the product recall in case ofa contamination of the cocoa beans, which could be a chemicalcontamination while farming, fermenting or drying. In this case allchocolate bars produced with cocoa beans from a certain cocoafarmer need to be recalled. R2 simulates the product recall in caseof a contamination of a processing batch, which could be caused bya problem in a roasting process. In this case all chocolate barsproduced in a certain roasting process need to be recalled. Thesimulation models allow to run single and multiple simulations.Due to the importance of the roasting process it is also possible torun single or multiple simulations automatically for different processingbatch sizes. For this paper, we simulated the food scares fora range of processing batch sizes between 1,600 kg and 5,000 kg(every multiple of 200 kg). Each of the sizes is then run multipletimes, while information such as number of runs, processing batchsize, recall size and number of processing batches (which reflectsthe production efficiency) is registered, and average results can bedetermined.
Being translated, please wait..
