All at sea in a barbed wire canoe:

All at sea in a barbed wire canoe: Professor
Cohen’s transatlantic voyage in IPE
Richard Higgott and Matthew Watson
University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
ABSTRACT
The following article is written as a sympathetic critique of Benjamin Cohen’s
recent identification in RIPE of incommensurable traditions of American and
British IPE. It is also designed to engender further debate within the subject
field on this most central of issues. Our argument is that scholars should
beware the rigid terms in which Cohen identifies IPE’s transatlantic divide,
because simply by naming his two camps as polar opposites the invitation is
open to others to entrench such an opposition in their own work. This would
be regrettable enough had IPE already lapsed into the geographical division
that Cohen describes. It is made more regrettable still by the fact that this
is in any case an inaccurate account of the field which serves to marginalise
much of the work that is currently at its cutting edge.

Results (Chinese) 1:

所有在海上在铁丝网独木舟： 教授科恩的跨大西洋航行中思想政治教育理查德 Higgott 和 Matthew 华生华威大学、 考文垂 CV4 7AL，英国摘要以下文章是写成本杰明 · 科恩同情批判最近鉴定中成熟的不可通约的传统的美国和英国伦敦国际原油交易所。它还旨在进一步产生内主题辩论对这场最重要的问题。我们的论点是学者应当心僵硬的术语中，科恩认出了 IPE 的跨大西洋鸿沟，因为简单地命名为他的两个阵营是极端对立邀请开放给其他人来巩固这种反对在他们自己的工作。这将会令人遗憾的足够已 IPE 已经陷入地理区划科恩的描述。它由这一事实更令人遗憾，这在任何情况下是领域的不准确的帐户，藉此排挤了很多的工作，目前其刀具刃口处。

Results (Chinese) 3:

所有在铁丝网的独木舟在海上：教授
科恩的跨大西洋航行在IPE
李察Higgott和Matthew Watson
华威大学，考文垂CV4 7AL，英国
摘要
以下文章是写一个同情的批评本杰明科恩的
最近鉴定的成熟的不可通约的传统的美国和英国的IPE
。它的设计也造成进一步的讨论话题
领域内的最中心的问题。我们的观点是，学者应该
小心刚性条款，科恩认为IPE的大西洋鸿沟，
因为简单的命名他的两个阵营对立的两极，邀请
开放给其他人来巩固自己的工作这样的反对。这将
遗憾的是有足够的政治地理区划
已经陷入了科恩。这是更令人遗憾的事实，这
仍然是在任何情况下，它排斥
很多的工作，是目前最前沿的研究领域的一个不准确的帐户。