How Mind Maps facilitate the learning processInteresting and engaging: translation - How Mind Maps facilitate the learning processInteresting and engaging: Indonesian how to say

How Mind Maps facilitate the learni

How Mind Maps facilitate the learning process
Interesting and engaging: Goodnough and Woods (2002) discovered that partakers in their study
perceived Mind Mapping as a fun, interesting and motivating approach to learning. Several of these
participants attributed the fun aspect to the opportunity to be creative when creating Mind Maps
through lots of choice in colour, symbols, key words and design.

4. Goodnough, K. and Woods, R. (2002), ‘Student and Teacher Perceptions of Mind Mapping: A
Middle School Case Study’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational
st thResearch Association, New Orleans, 1 to 5 April 2002.

The efficacy of the Mind Map study technique
88
A study conducted by Farrand, Hussain and Hennessey (2002) , aimed to examine the effectiveness of using the Mind Map technique to improve factual recall from written information, looking at whether Mind Mapping overcomes many of the limitations of more conventional study techniques.

Medical undergraduate students participating in the study were exposed to a 600 word passage of scientific text and given three short tests based upon the text to establish baseline data. They were then divided into two groups before being tested again. A week later the students sat a third test to evaluate long-term memory.
Only the Mind Map group maintained their improvement after one week. It was concluded that “Mind Maps provide an effective study technique when applied to written material” and are likely to “encourage a deeper level of processing” for better memory formation.

88. Farrand, P., Hussain, F. and Hennessy E. (2002), ‘The efficacy of the ‘mind map’ study technique’.
Medical Education, Vol. 36 (5), pp 426-431.

Using Mind Mapping for lesson planning can help teachers identify a logical teaching route and
increases recall of the subject matter. This can boost teaching confidence and facilitate the smooth
34 running of lessons (Boyson, 2009)
34. Boyson, G. (2009), ‘The Use of Mind Mapping in Teaching and Learning’. The Learning Institute, Assignment 3.


Mind Mapping was successfully applied for action planning to improve team processes within
42 executive education and management development programmes (Mento et al, 1999)
. Mento, A. J., Martinelli, P. and Jones R. M. (1999), ‘Mind Mapping in Executive Education: Applications and
Outcomes’. The Journal of Management Development, Vol. 18, Issue 4.

Authors: Paul Farrand, Fearzana Hussain and Enid Hennessy
Title: The efficacy of the ‘mind map’ study technique
Publication: Medical Education, Vol. 36 (5), pp 426-431
Date/Year: 2002

Purpose
This scholarly paper examines the effectiveness of using the Mind Map technique to improve factual
recall from written information. Its focus is on Mind Mapping as a study technique. The paper also looks at whether Mind Mapping overcomes many of the limitations of more conventional study techniques.

Description
50 second and third year medical undergraduate students participated in a study where they were
exposed to a 600 word passage of scientific text and given 3 short tests based upon the text. The
purpose of the first test was to establish baseline data and the students were then randomly allocated into two groups – half were assigned to a ‘Mind Map’ group and the other half to a ‘self-selected study technique’ group. After a 30 minute interval, both groups were again exposed to the text and were told to use either Mind Map or self-study techniques to learn the material depending on their particular group. The Mind Map group had been trained in the technique during the 30 minute interval. The students were then given a second test after a short distraction task. A week later, the students sat a third test which was used to evaluate the effects of both techniques on long-term memory. Motivation was also tested.

Key Results
A significant improvement in recall of factual material was found in both groups at the second test
compared with the baseline (first test). However, only the Mind Map group maintained their
improvement after one week with a 10% increase over baseline compared to a 6% increase for those
using preferred study methods. This suggests that the Mind Map technique improved long-term
memory of factual information in these medical students. However, motivation was found to be higher in the self-selecting group than in the Mind Map group, possibly due to reluctance in students to use what is considered to be a memory strategy as a study aid. The researchers theorise that the improvement within the Mind Map group would have been 13% had motivation for using the technique been higher.
Conclusion
The authors concluded that “Mind Maps provide an effective study technique when applied to written material” and are likely to “encourage a deeper level of processing” for better memory formation. The increased use of Mind Maps within medical curricula should therefore be welcomed. On a cautionary note, it is recommended that consideration is given towards ways of improving motivation amongst users before Mind Maps are generally adopted as a study technique. The authors suggest that effective training is provided so that students are enthusiastic about adopting this approach in preference to other conventional study techniques.

Full paper available at:
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118952400/abstract

0/5000
From: -
To: -
Results (Indonesian) 1: [Copy]
Copied!
How Mind Maps facilitate the learning processInteresting and engaging: Goodnough and Woods (2002) discovered that partakers in their study perceived Mind Mapping as a fun, interesting and motivating approach to learning. Several of these participants attributed the fun aspect to the opportunity to be creative when creating Mind Maps through lots of choice in colour, symbols, key words and design.4. Goodnough, K. and Woods, R. (2002), ‘Student and Teacher Perceptions of Mind Mapping: AMiddle School Case Study’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educationalst thResearch Association, New Orleans, 1 to 5 April 2002.The efficacy of the Mind Map study technique 88A study conducted by Farrand, Hussain and Hennessey (2002) , aimed to examine the effectiveness of using the Mind Map technique to improve factual recall from written information, looking at whether Mind Mapping overcomes many of the limitations of more conventional study techniques. Medical undergraduate students participating in the study were exposed to a 600 word passage of scientific text and given three short tests based upon the text to establish baseline data. They were then divided into two groups before being tested again. A week later the students sat a third test to evaluate long-term memory. Only the Mind Map group maintained their improvement after one week. It was concluded that “Mind Maps provide an effective study technique when applied to written material” and are likely to “encourage a deeper level of processing” for better memory formation.88. Farrand, P., Hussain, F. and Hennessy E. (2002), ‘The efficacy of the ‘mind map’ study technique’. Medical Education, Vol. 36 (5), pp 426-431. Using Mind Mapping for lesson planning can help teachers identify a logical teaching route and increases recall of the subject matter. This can boost teaching confidence and facilitate the smooth 34 running of lessons (Boyson, 2009)34. Boyson, G. (2009), ‘The Use of Mind Mapping in Teaching and Learning’. The Learning Institute, Assignment 3. Mind Mapping was successfully applied for action planning to improve team processes within 42 executive education and management development programmes (Mento et al, 1999). Mento, A. J., Martinelli, P. and Jones R. M. (1999), ‘Mind Mapping in Executive Education: Applications and Outcomes’. The Journal of Management Development, Vol. 18, Issue 4.Authors: Paul Farrand, Fearzana Hussain and Enid Hennessy Title: The efficacy of the ‘mind map’ study technique Publication: Medical Education, Vol. 36 (5), pp 426-431 Date/Year: 2002 Purpose This scholarly paper examines the effectiveness of using the Mind Map technique to improve factual recall from written information. Its focus is on Mind Mapping as a study technique. The paper also looks at whether Mind Mapping overcomes many of the limitations of more conventional study techniques. Description 50 second and third year medical undergraduate students participated in a study where they were exposed to a 600 word passage of scientific text and given 3 short tests based upon the text. The purpose of the first test was to establish baseline data and the students were then randomly allocated into two groups – half were assigned to a ‘Mind Map’ group and the other half to a ‘self-selected study technique’ group. After a 30 minute interval, both groups were again exposed to the text and were told to use either Mind Map or self-study techniques to learn the material depending on their particular group. The Mind Map group had been trained in the technique during the 30 minute interval. The students were then given a second test after a short distraction task. A week later, the students sat a third test which was used to evaluate the effects of both techniques on long-term memory. Motivation was also tested. Key Results A significant improvement in recall of factual material was found in both groups at the second test compared with the baseline (first test). However, only the Mind Map group maintained their improvement after one week with a 10% increase over baseline compared to a 6% increase for those using preferred study methods. This suggests that the Mind Map technique improved long-term memory of factual information in these medical students. However, motivation was found to be higher in the self-selecting group than in the Mind Map group, possibly due to reluctance in students to use what is considered to be a memory strategy as a study aid. The researchers theorise that the improvement within the Mind Map group would have been 13% had motivation for using the technique been higher. Conclusion The authors concluded that “Mind Maps provide an effective study technique when applied to written material” and are likely to “encourage a deeper level of processing” for better memory formation. The increased use of Mind Maps within medical curricula should therefore be welcomed. On a cautionary note, it is recommended that consideration is given towards ways of improving motivation amongst users before Mind Maps are generally adopted as a study technique. The authors suggest that effective training is provided so that students are enthusiastic about adopting this approach in preference to other conventional study techniques. Full paper available at: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118952400/abstract
Being translated, please wait..
Results (Indonesian) 2:[Copy]
Copied!
Bagaimana Peta Pikiran memfasilitasi proses pembelajaran
menarik dan menarik: Goodnough dan Woods (2002) menemukan bahwa mengambil bagian dalam studi mereka
dianggap Mind Mapping sebagai menyenangkan, pendekatan yang menarik dan memotivasi untuk belajar. Beberapa ini
peserta dikaitkan aspek menyenangkan untuk kesempatan untuk menjadi kreatif saat membuat Peta Pikiran
melalui banyak pilihan warna, simbol, kata-kata kunci dan desain. 4. Goodnough, K. dan Woods, R. (2002), 'Murid dan Guru Persepsi Mind Mapping: Sebuah Studi Kasus Sekolah Tengah'. Makalah yang dipresentasikan pada Pertemuan Tahunan American Educational st thResearch Association, New Orleans, 01-05 April 2002. Efektivitas teknik studi Mind Map 88 Sebuah penelitian yang dilakukan oleh Farrand, Hussain dan Hennessey (2002), bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektivitas menggunakan teknik Mind Map untuk meningkatkan recall faktual dari informasi tertulis, melihat apakah Mind Mapping mengatasi banyak keterbatasan teknik yang lebih pembelajaran konvensional. mahasiswa Kedokteran yang berpartisipasi dalam penelitian itu terkena bagian 600 kata teks ilmiah dan diberikan tiga singkat tes berdasarkan teks untuk membangun data dasar. Mereka kemudian dibagi menjadi dua kelompok sebelum diuji lagi. Seminggu kemudian para siswa duduk tes ketiga untuk mengevaluasi memori jangka panjang. Hanya kelompok Mind Map dipertahankan perbaikan mereka setelah satu minggu. Disimpulkan bahwa "Peta Pikiran memberikan teknik belajar yang efektif bila diterapkan untuk bahan tertulis" dan cenderung "mendorong tingkat yang lebih dalam pengolahan" untuk pembentukan memori yang lebih baik. 88. Farrand, P., Hussain, F. dan Hennessy E. (2002), 'The khasiat dari' peta pikiran 'teknik studi'. Pendidikan Kedokteran, Vol. 36 (5), pp 426-431. Menggunakan Mind Mapping untuk perencanaan pelajaran dapat membantu guru mengidentifikasi rute mengajar logis dan meningkatkan recall dari materi pelajaran. Hal ini dapat meningkatkan rasa percaya diri mengajar dan memfasilitasi kelancaran 34 menjalankan pelajaran (Boyson, 2009) 34. Boyson, G. (2009), 'The Penggunaan Mind Mapping dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran'. The Learning Institute, Penugasan 3. Mind Mapping berhasil diterapkan untuk perencanaan tindakan untuk meningkatkan proses tim dalam 42 program pendidikan dan pengembangan manajemen eksekutif (Mento et al, 1999). Mento, AJ, Martinelli, P. Jones dan RM (1999), 'Mind Mapping dalam Pendidikan Eksekutif: Aplikasi dan Hasil'. Journal of Pengembangan Manajemen, Vol. 18, Issue 4. Penulis: Paul Farrand, Fearzana Hussain dan Enid Hennessy Judul: Khasiat dari 'pikiran peta' studi teknik Publication: Pendidikan Kedokteran, Vol. 36 (5), pp 426-431 Tanggal / Tahun: 2002 Tujuan karya ilmiah ini membahas efektivitas menggunakan teknik Mind Map untuk meningkatkan faktual recall dari informasi tertulis. Fokusnya adalah pada Mind Mapping sebagai teknik penelitian. Makalah ini juga terlihat pada apakah Mind Mapping mengatasi banyak keterbatasan teknik yang lebih studi konvensional. Keterangan 50 tahun kedua dan ketiga mahasiswa kedokteran berpartisipasi dalam studi di mana mereka terkena bagian 600 kata teks ilmiah dan diberikan 3 tes singkat berdasarkan pada teks. The Tujuan dari tes pertama adalah mendirikan data dasar dan siswa kemudian secara acak dialokasikan dalam dua kelompok - setengah ditugaskan untuk kelompok 'Mind Map' dan setengah lainnya untuk 'teknik studi dipilih sendiri' kelompok. Setelah interval 30 menit, kedua kelompok lagi terkena teks dan diberitahu untuk menggunakan Mind Map atau teknik belajar-belajar materi tergantung pada kelompok tertentu mereka. Mind Map kelompok telah dilatih dalam teknik selama interval 30 menit. Para siswa kemudian diberi tes kedua setelah tugas gangguan singkat. Seminggu kemudian, para siswa duduk tes ketiga yang digunakan untuk mengevaluasi efek dari kedua teknik pada memori jangka panjang. Motivasi juga diuji. Hasil Key Sebuah peningkatan yang signifikan dalam recall bahan faktual ditemukan pada kedua kelompok di tes kedua dibandingkan dengan baseline (tes pertama). Namun, hanya kelompok Mind Map dipertahankan mereka perbaikan setelah satu minggu dengan kenaikan 10% lebih awal dibandingkan dengan kenaikan 6% bagi mereka yang menggunakan metode studi pilihan. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa teknik Mind Map ditingkatkan jangka panjang memori informasi faktual di ini mahasiswa kedokteran. Namun, motivasi ditemukan lebih tinggi pada kelompok diri memilih dibandingkan kelompok Mind Map, mungkin karena keengganan siswa untuk menggunakan apa yang dianggap sebagai strategi memori sebagai bantuan studi. Para peneliti berteori bahwa peningkatan dalam kelompok Mind Map akan menjadi 13% memiliki motivasi untuk menggunakan teknik lebih tinggi. Kesimpulan Para penulis menyimpulkan bahwa "Peta Pikiran memberikan teknik belajar yang efektif bila diterapkan untuk bahan tertulis" dan cenderung "mendorong tingkat yang lebih dalam pengolahan "untuk pembentukan memori yang lebih baik. Peningkatan penggunaan peta pikiran dalam kurikulum medis karenanya harus disambut. Pada catatan penting, dianjurkan bahwa pertimbangan diberikan terhadap cara-cara meningkatkan motivasi antara pengguna sebelum Peta Pikiran umumnya diadopsi sebagai teknik penelitian. Para penulis menyarankan bahwa pelatihan yang efektif diberikan sehingga siswa antusias mengadopsi pendekatan ini dalam preferensi untuk teknik pembelajaran konvensional lainnya. Kertas penuh tersedia di: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118952400/abstract




















































Being translated, please wait..
 
Other languages
The translation tool support: Afrikaans, Albanian, Amharic, Arabic, Armenian, Azerbaijani, Basque, Belarusian, Bengali, Bosnian, Bulgarian, Catalan, Cebuano, Chichewa, Chinese, Chinese Traditional, Corsican, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Detect language, Dutch, English, Esperanto, Estonian, Filipino, Finnish, French, Frisian, Galician, Georgian, German, Greek, Gujarati, Haitian Creole, Hausa, Hawaiian, Hebrew, Hindi, Hmong, Hungarian, Icelandic, Igbo, Indonesian, Irish, Italian, Japanese, Javanese, Kannada, Kazakh, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Klingon, Korean, Kurdish (Kurmanji), Kyrgyz, Lao, Latin, Latvian, Lithuanian, Luxembourgish, Macedonian, Malagasy, Malay, Malayalam, Maltese, Maori, Marathi, Mongolian, Myanmar (Burmese), Nepali, Norwegian, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Punjabi, Romanian, Russian, Samoan, Scots Gaelic, Serbian, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovak, Slovenian, Somali, Spanish, Sundanese, Swahili, Swedish, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turkish, Turkmen, Ukrainian, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnamese, Welsh, Xhosa, Yiddish, Yoruba, Zulu, Language translation.

Copyright ©2025 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: