The context above encompasses what is behind the question 14, answered by the administrations. The development of new regulatory frameworks, favouring LLU (local loop unbundling) and other types of asymmetric regulation is based on the “ladder of investment theory”, which is predominant as justification for mandatory regulatory intervention. On the other hand, there are other more sceptical views on the capacity of this “theory” to give incentives for network investments or eventually lead to facilities-based competition (dynamic efficiency).
In this sense we can highlight some answers that are linked with these backgrounds above.