This essay has compared and contras

This essay has compared and contrasted the classical realism of Hans Morgenthau with Kenneth Waltz’s neorealism. It has also examined and challenged the conventional wisdom on what realism as a school of thought is supposed to encompass and questioned some of the similarities and differences that supposedly exists between classical and neorealism. This essay should therefore be seen as a contribution to the increasingly sophisticated engagement with realism in IR

Results (Chinese) 1:

这篇文章已经比较和对比汉斯 · 摩根索与 Kenneth 华尔兹新现实主义的经典现实主义。此外审查和挑战传统的智慧，关于什么现实主义作为一种思想流派是应该包括，质疑了一些据称存在古典之间的相似之处和差异和新现实主义。这篇文章应该因此被看作是日益复杂的订婚的贡献与现实主义的红外光谱

Results (Chinese) 2:

本文已比较和对比汉斯·摩根索的现实主义古典与肯尼思·沃尔兹的新现实主义。它还审查和质疑的应该是包含和质疑的一些异同的古典和新现实主义之间理应存在什么现实主义思想学派的传统智慧。本文因此，应视为IR日趋娴熟贡献与现实

Results (Chinese) 3:

本文比较了和摩根索的古典现实主义与肯尼思华尔兹的新现实主义对比。它也审查和挑战是现实主义学派是应该包括和质疑的一些异同，推测存在古典和新现实主义之间的传统智慧。因此本文应被视为与现实主义在IR日益复杂的接合的贡献