In fact on average, each user was connected to a search network of just over 5 other searchers by the staks that they shared.
The vast majority of staks were created as public staks, although most (52%) remained the domain of a single member, the stak creator. Thus 48% of staks were shared with at least one other user and, on average, these staks attracted 3.6 members. Another way to look at this is as depicted in Fig. 18.11(b): 70% of users make the effort to share or join staks (sociable users); and only 30% of users created staks just for their own personal use and declined to join staks created by others (solitary users).
At its core HeyStaks is motivated by the idea that web search is an inherently social or collaborative activity. And even though mainstream search engines do not support this, searchers do find alternative collaboration channels (e.g., email, IM, etc.) with which to partially, albeit inefficiently, share their search experiences; see for example [57]. One of the most important early questions to ask about HeyStaks users concerns the extent to which their natural search activity serves to create a community of collaborating searchers. As users search, tag, and vote they are effectively producing and consuming community search knowledge. A user might be the first to select or tag a given result for a stak and, in this context, they have produced new search knowledge. Later, if this result is promoted to another user and then re-selected (or tagged or voted on), then this other user is said to have consumed that search knowledge; of course they have also produced search knowledge as their selection, tag, or vote is added to the stak.
We have found that 85% of users have engaged in search collaborations. The majority have consumed results that were produced by at least one other user, and on average these users have consumed results from 7.45 other users. In contrast 50% of users have produced knowledge that has been consumed by at least one other user, and in this case each of these producers has created search knowledge that is consumed by more than 12 other users on average.
One question we might ask is to what degree individual users tend to be producers or consumers of search knowledge. Are some searchers net producers of search knowledge, in the sense that they are more inclined to create search knowledge that
Results (
Thai) 1:
[Copy]Copied!
ในความเป็นจริงเฉลี่ย ผู้ถูกเชื่อมต่อกับเครือข่ายค้นหาของผู้อื่นเพียง 5 โดย staks ที่พวกเขาร่วมกันStaks ส่วนใหญ่ถูกสร้างเป็น staks สาธารณะ แม้ว่าโดเมนของสมาชิกเดียว สร้าง stak ยังคงส่วนใหญ่ (52%) 48% ของ staks ถูกใช้ร่วมกับผู้อื่นน้อย และ เฉลี่ย staks เหล่านี้ดึงดูด 3.6 สมาชิก อีกวิธีที่นี้เป็นแสดงใน Fig. 18.11(b): 70% ของผู้ใช้ทำการพยายามที่จะใช้ร่วมกัน หรือเข้าร่วม staks (กันเองผู้ใช้); และเพียง 30% ของผู้ใช้สร้าง staks สำหรับใช้งานส่วนบุคคลของตนเอง และปฏิเสธที่จะเข้าร่วม staks ที่สร้าง โดยผู้อื่น (ผู้ใช้ปัจเจก)At its core HeyStaks is motivated by the idea that web search is an inherently social or collaborative activity. And even though mainstream search engines do not support this, searchers do find alternative collaboration channels (e.g., email, IM, etc.) with which to partially, albeit inefficiently, share their search experiences; see for example [57]. One of the most important early questions to ask about HeyStaks users concerns the extent to which their natural search activity serves to create a community of collaborating searchers. As users search, tag, and vote they are effectively producing and consuming community search knowledge. A user might be the first to select or tag a given result for a stak and, in this context, they have produced new search knowledge. Later, if this result is promoted to another user and then re-selected (or tagged or voted on), then this other user is said to have consumed that search knowledge; of course they have also produced search knowledge as their selection, tag, or vote is added to the stak.We have found that 85% of users have engaged in search collaborations. The majority have consumed results that were produced by at least one other user, and on average these users have consumed results from 7.45 other users. In contrast 50% of users have produced knowledge that has been consumed by at least one other user, and in this case each of these producers has created search knowledge that is consumed by more than 12 other users on average.One question we might ask is to what degree individual users tend to be producers or consumers of search knowledge. Are some searchers net producers of search knowledge, in the sense that they are more inclined to create search knowledge that
Being translated, please wait..