Scale generality. Although scale ge

Scale generality. Although scale generality was not a significant moderator within the age trajectory, there were significant differences in the stability of vocational interests according to the generality of the scale by which they were measured. We expected general interests to be the most stable, followed by basic interests, with occupational interests being the most likely to change across time. Contrary to our expectations, the stability estimate for basic interests was the lowest at .57, sandwiched by significantly higher estimates for general interests (.59) and occupational interests (.63). Moderator analysis indicated that age, test–retest interval, and coefficient types had significant effects on stability estimates among the three generality levels (see Table 3). When we dropped profile correlations and controlled for age and test–retest interval, the population estimates for basic interests and general interests increased to .59 and .60, respectively, whereas the estimate for occupational interests decreased to .61. The differences in stability among scale generalities were attenuated and were statistically insignificant.
Interest classification. We tested whether stability of interests differed across different interest classifications. Because only a small subset of the studies examined the stability of interests in terms of Holland’s (1958, 1997) six interest types (k 12) or Kuder’s (1939, 1977) 10 activity preferences (k 24), we excluded interest classification from the mixed-effects model. Instead, we examined its relation to interest stability solely by contrasting the stability estimates of Holland’s interest types with the estimates of Kuder’s activity preferences (see Table 6).

Results (Indonesian) 1:

Skala keumuman. Meskipun skala keumuman tidak moderator signifikan dalam lintasan usia, ada perbedaan yang signifikan dalam stabilitas kejuruan kepentingan menurut keumuman skala yang mereka diukur. Kami mengharapkan kepentingan umum untuk menjadi yang paling stabil, diikuti oleh kepentingan dasar, dengan kepentingan pekerjaan menjadi yang paling mungkin untuk mengubah menembus waktu. Bertentangan dengan harapan kita, perkiraan stabilitas untuk kepentingan dasar adalah yang terendah di.57, diapit oleh perkiraan secara signifikan lebih tinggi untuk kepentingan umum (. 59) dan kepentingan pekerjaan (. 63). Moderator analisis menunjukkan bahwa usia, tes-tes ulang interval, dan jenis koefisien memiliki efek yang signifikan pada stabilitas perkiraan antara tingkat tiga keumuman (Lihat tabel 3). Ketika kita menjatuhkan korelasi profil dan dikendalikan untuk usia dan tes-tes ulang interval, perkiraan populasi untuk kepentingan dasar dan kepentingan umum meningkat menjadi.59 dan.60, masing-masing, sedangkan perkiraan untuk kepentingan kerja menurun untuk.61. Perbedaan dalam stabilitas antara skala generalisasi yang dilemahkan dan itu secara statistik tidak signifikan.Interest classification. We tested whether stability of interests differed across different interest classifications. Because only a small subset of the studies examined the stability of interests in terms of Holland’s (1958, 1997) six interest types (k 12) or Kuder’s (1939, 1977) 10 activity preferences (k 24), we excluded interest classification from the mixed-effects model. Instead, we examined its relation to interest stability solely by contrasting the stability estimates of Holland’s interest types with the estimates of Kuder’s activity preferences (see Table 6).