Holistic RubricsThe basis for holis

Holistic Rubrics
The basis for holistic scoring is that the performance, whether writing
or a portfolio, is greater than any of its parts (Camara, 2003; Kobrin
& Kimmel, 2006; Mullis, 1984; Quellmalz, 1986). In holistic scoring,
the focus is on the prominent features of a performance. In the early
years of large-scale writing assessment, holistic rubrics were valued for
their focus on the “whole” essay, which writing experts believed would
promote sound instruction in the interrelationship of the parts rather
than separating writing instruction into editing exercises or worksheets
(White, 1994).
Holistic rubrics often follow a paragraph or block format as shown
in the National Association of Educational Progress (NAEP) rubric
in Figure 6.1. Notice that the rubric describes six performance levels.
Within each level are the evaluative criteria that the rater should consider
when assigning a score. The criteria in this rubric address important
elements in narrative writing, such as story development, descriptive
details, connected events, varied sentence structure, specific word
choices, sentence boundaries, grammar, spelling, and mechanics. Also
note that the criteria are described across the six performance levels.
For instance, in terms of connected events, the description moves from
“Exhibits no control over organization” at the Unsatisfactory performance
level to “Events are well connected and ties the stories together
with transitions across the response” at the Excellent performance level.
Between the two levels of Unsatisfactory and Excellent, the “connected
events” criterion describes a continuum of performance.

Results (Indonesian) 1:

Holistic RubricsThe basis for holistic scoring is that the performance, whether writingor a portfolio, is greater than any of its parts (Camara, 2003; Kobrin& Kimmel, 2006; Mullis, 1984; Quellmalz, 1986). In holistic scoring,the focus is on the prominent features of a performance. In the earlyyears of large-scale writing assessment, holistic rubrics were valued fortheir focus on the “whole” essay, which writing experts believed wouldpromote sound instruction in the interrelationship of the parts ratherthan separating writing instruction into editing exercises or worksheets(White, 1994).Holistic rubrics often follow a paragraph or block format as shownin the National Association of Educational Progress (NAEP) rubricin Figure 6.1. Notice that the rubric describes six performance levels.Within each level are the evaluative criteria that the rater should considerwhen assigning a score. The criteria in this rubric address importantelements in narrative writing, such as story development, descriptivedetails, connected events, varied sentence structure, specific wordchoices, sentence boundaries, grammar, spelling, and mechanics. Alsonote that the criteria are described across the six performance levels.For instance, in terms of connected events, the description moves from“Exhibits no control over organization” at the Unsatisfactory performancelevel to “Events are well connected and ties the stories togetherdengan transisi di respon"di tingkat kinerja yang sangat baik.Antara dua tingkat Unsatisfactory dan luar biasa, "terhubungkriteria peristiwa"menggambarkan sebuah kontinum dari kinerja.

Results (Indonesian) 2:

Rubrik holistik
Dasar untuk penilaian holistik adalah bahwa kinerja, apakah tulisan
atau portofolio, lebih besar daripada bagian-bagiannya (Camara, 2003; Kobrin
& Kimmel, 2006; Mullis, 1984; Quellmalz, 1986). Dalam mencetak gol holistik,
fokusnya adalah pada fitur yang menonjol dari kinerja. Pada awal
tahun penilaian tulis besar-besaran, rubrik holistik yang dihargai karena
fokus mereka pada "seluruh" esai, yang menulis ahli percaya akan
mempromosikan instruksi suara dalam keterkaitan bagian-bagian yang agak
daripada memisahkan menulis instruksi dalam latihan editing atau lembar kerja
( putih, 1994).
rubrik holistik sering mengikuti paragraf atau blok format sebagaimana ditunjukkan
dalam National Association of Educational Progress (NAEP) rubrik
pada Gambar 6.1. Perhatikan bahwa rubrik menggambarkan enam tingkat kinerja.
Dalam setiap tingkat adalah kriteria evaluatif yang penilai harus mempertimbangkan
ketika menetapkan skor. Kriteria alamat rubrik ini penting
elemen dalam menulis narasi, seperti pengembangan cerita, deskriptif
rincian, acara terhubung, struktur kalimat bervariasi, kata tertentu
pilihan, batas-batas kalimat, tata bahasa, ejaan, dan mekanik. Juga
perhatikan bahwa kriteria dijelaskan di tingkat enam kinerja.
Misalnya, dalam hal peristiwa yang terhubung, deskripsi bergerak dari
"Pameran kontrol atas organisasi" pada kinerja tidak memuaskan
tingkat ke "Acara yang terhubung dengan baik dan mengikat cerita bersama-sama
dengan transisi di respon "di tingkat kinerja yang sangat baik.
Antara dua tingkat memuaskan dan sangat baik, yang" terhubung
peristiwa "kriteria menggambarkan kontinum kinerja.