Results (
Thai) 1:
[Copy]Copied!
Section B consisted ofeight (8) items that were used to measure financial rewards while Section C consisted of ten (10) items which wereused to measure non-financial rewards. All items in the questionnaire were adapted from existing questionnaires that Farah Liyana Bustamam et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 144 ( 2014 ) 392 – 402 395were taken from various journals with appropriate adjustments and that have been reported valid and producedreliable results. Both sections B and C used Likert 5-point scale as the measurement technique to illustrate therespondent’s perceptions about the statements. Responses to all items were made on a scale format ranging from “1=strongly disagree” to “5= strongly agree”. The last part, section D, consisted of twenty (20) items which required therespondents to evaluate their job satisfaction. The Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (MSQ) developed byWeiss, Dawis, England, and Lofquist (1967) was used to measure the level of job satisfaction (Gunlu, Aksarayli,and Percin, 2010). It includes general satisfaction, extrinsic satisfaction and intrinsic satisfaction dimensions, such asworking conditions, co-workers relationship, supervision-human relations, supervision-technical, compensation,recognition, independence, variety, job security, achievement, and more (Gunlu, Aksarayli, and Percin, 2010).Respondents were also required to rate their level of satisfaction using Likert 5-point scale, ranging from “1=verydissatisfied” to “5= very satisfied”. Social Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software was used to analyze the data
from the questionnaire. The analyses examined in the study include:
Being translated, please wait..
