Statistical methodsData obtained fr

Statistical methods
Data obtained from the test conducted were then analyzed descriptively and
inferentially to seek the answer to the questions raised. The mean score for each
question was calculated for each group of the sample. Independent samples t-test
was then performed to analyzed the differences in the level of conceptual
understanding of Newtonian Physics between the groups, with p values less than
0.05 is considered to be statistically significant. All statistical analyses were
performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 15.0.
Findings
Descriptive analysis
Result obtained from the Test of Conceptual Understanding of Newtonian
Physics among students show that there is a difference in the ability of B.Sc.Ed
students and form four science students in answering correctly the paper. It is found
that out of 28 questions related to the concept of Newtonian Physics proposed, it is
found that 13 of them received a good response from B.Sc.Ed students and 15 other
questions got a good response from the form four science students. This imply the
inconsistency between the knowledge of Newtonian Physics of form four science
students and the B.Sc.Ed students.
Analysis shows that for B.Sc.Ed students, the most difficult questions (less
than 20 students answered correctly) is questions related to the concept of ball
movement on flat surfaces, whereas for form four science students, the most
difficult question is related to the concept of conservation of energy and
momentum. In relation to that, for B.Sc.Ed students, the questions that most of
them get the correct answer (more than 80 students answered correctly) are
questions related to the concept of inertia, momentum, velocity-time graph,
balanced force and impulse. While for form four science students the similar question is only focused to the concept of inertia. This results show that in general,
compared to form four science students, B.Sc.Ed students are found to have
grasped more concepts on Newtonian Physics.

Results (Indonesian) 1:

Metode statistikData Diperoleh dari tes dilakukan kemudian dianalisis deskriptif daninferentially untuk mencari jawaban untuk pertanyaan yang diajukan. Nilai berarti untuk masing-masingpertanyaan dihitung untuk setiap kelompok sampel. Independen sampel uji tkemudian dilakukan untuk menganalisis perbedaan dalam tingkat konseptualpemahaman tentang fisika Newton antara kelompok, dengan nilai-nilai p kurang dari0,05 dianggap signifikan secara statistik. Semua analisis statistik yangdilakukan dengan menggunakan versi SPSS (Statistik paket untuk ilmu-ilmu sosial) 15,0.TemuanAnalisis deskriptifHasil yang Diperoleh dari uji dari konseptual pemahaman dari NewtonianFisika antara siswa menunjukkan bahwa ada perbedaan dalam kemampuan B.Sc.Edsiswa dan mahasiswa ilmu bentuk empat dalam menjawab dengan benar kertas. Hal ini ditemukanyang dari 28 pertanyaan yang berkaitan dengan konsep Newtonian fisika yang diusulkan, ituditemukan bahwa 13 di antaranya menerima tanggapan yang baik dari B.Sc.Ed siswa dan 15 lainnyapertanyaan mendapat tanggapan yang baik dari bentuk empat ilmu pengetahuan siswa. Ini berartiperbedaan antara pengetahuan tentang fisika Newton ilmu bentuk empatsiswa dan mahasiswa B.Sc.Ed.Analisis menunjukkan bahwa untuk B.Sc.Ed siswa, pertanyaan yang paling sulit (kurangdari 20 siswa menjawab dengan benar) adalah pertanyaan-pertanyaan yang berkaitan dengan konsep bolagerakan pada permukaan datar, sedangkan untuk membentuk empat Sains siswa yang palingdifficult question is related to the concept of conservation of energy andmomentum. In relation to that, for B.Sc.Ed students, the questions that most ofthem get the correct answer (more than 80 students answered correctly) arequestions related to the concept of inertia, momentum, velocity-time graph,balanced force and impulse. While for form four science students the similar question is only focused to the concept of inertia. This results show that in general,compared to form four science students, B.Sc.Ed students are found to havegrasped more concepts on Newtonian Physics.