Using these dimensions, criteria for an instrument were developed and refined over a number of classroom applications within five semesters. A teamwork abilities indicator was administered to team members via an anonymous online survey. This practice and these criteria permit group members to become familiar with how to evaluate individual performances based on what was perceived as reasonable expectations of team member behavior. The premise is the team members are in the best position to judge performance of their peers in such an assessment. Exhibit 1 illustrates the final version of the instrument. Nine peer-reading criteria used semantic differential items scored on a range of seven points, from 7, the highest possible rating to 1, the lowest possible rating. At the beginning sessions of the course, learners are introduced to the online surveys which presented attributes of high-performing teams. Each student was asked to rate the level of importance of entrepreneurial attributes, and teamwork competencies on an anonymous online survey (Hackbert, 2000a, 2000b) and told how it will be used to help judge performances within groups. At the mid-term and again upon the completion of a cross-functional class project, group members are asked to rate themselves on the items. Each member is then asked to rate every other member on the same items. In this way, there is the peer rating on each of the items for each of a group's members. Learners are also encouraged to write comments relevant to their ratings on the back of the instrument. Exhibit 2 illustrates how learners summarize the E-team meeting times, for each session and the total Eteam time-on-task for the course.