We are honored by our commentators,

We are honored by our commentators, Ulrich Müller and Mauricio Garcia-Barrera [2018] and Philip David Zelazo [2018], for their commentaries on our paper which summarizes and updates our developmental theory of intelligence [Demetriou, Makris, Kazi, Spanoudis, Shayer, & Kazali, 2018]. This theory, drawing on a long series of empirical studies (see references in the target article) and three powerful research traditions focusing on the human mind, aims to account for three aspects of the human mind: the mental processes involved in real-time understanding and problem solving (cognitive tradition [Baddelley, 2012; Johnson-Laird, 2012]), their development and interactions from birth to adulthood (developmental tradition [Case, 1985; Pascual-Leone, 1988; Piaget, 1970; Zelazo, 2015]), and the factors causing individual differences in the state and development of mental processes (differential tradition [Carroll, 1993; Jensen, 1998; Spearman, 1927]). However, it is noted that the theory is broader than what is presented in the target paper. The target paper focuses on the dimensions of general intelligence, specifying their organization and development. In its fullness, the theory also specifies mind-personality relations, the brain bases of the processes involved, their grounding into culture, and outlines its implications for education. For a complete presentation, the reader is referred to our recent book [Demetriou & Spanoudis, 2018]. This book answers many of the concerns of the commentators but it was not available when the target paper was published. Here we focus on the points raised by the two commentaries.

Results (Indonesian) 2:

Kami dihormati oleh komentator kami, Ulrich Müller dan Mauricio Garcia-Barrera [2018] dan Philip David Zelazo [2018], untuk komentar mereka tentang makalah kami yang merangkum dan memperbarui teori perkembangan kami intelijen [Demetriou, Makris, Kazi, Spanoudis, Shayer, & Kazali, 2018]. Teori ini, menggambar pada serangkaian panjang studi empiris (Lihat referensi dalam artikel target) dan tiga tradisi penelitian yang kuat berfokus pada pikiran manusia, bertujuan untuk memperhitungkan tiga aspek dari pikiran manusia: proses mental yang terlibat dalam real-time pemahaman dan pemecahan masalah (tradisi kognitif [Baddelley, 2012; Johnson-LAIRD, 2012]), perkembangan dan interaksi mereka sejak lahir hingga dewasa (tradisi pembangunan [Case, 1985; Pascual-Leone, 1988; Piaget, 1970; Zelazo, 2015]), dan faktor yang menyebabkan perbedaan individu dalam keadaan dan perkembangan proses mental (tradisi diferensial [Carroll, 1993; Jensen, 1998; Spearman, 1927]). Namun, dicatat bahwa teori lebih luas daripada apa yang disajikan dalam kertas target. Makalah target berfokus pada dimensi kecerdasan umum, menentukan organisasi dan pengembangan mereka. Dalam kepenuhan, teori juga menentukan hubungan pikiran-kepribadian, dasar otak dari proses yang terlibat, landasan mereka ke dalam budaya, dan menguraikan implikasi untuk pendidikan. Untuk presentasi yang lengkap, pembaca dirujuk ke buku terbaru kami [Demetriou & Spanoudis, 2018]. Buku ini menjawab banyak keprihatinan para komentator tetapi itu tidak tersedia ketika kertas target diterbitkan. Di sini kita fokus pada poin yang dibangkitkan oleh dua tafsiran.