TRACEABILITY SYSTEMS IN THE MAJOR BEEF PRODUCINGAND TRADING COUNTRIESW translation - TRACEABILITY SYSTEMS IN THE MAJOR BEEF PRODUCINGAND TRADING COUNTRIESW Indonesian how to say

TRACEABILITY SYSTEMS IN THE MAJOR B

TRACEABILITY SYSTEMS IN THE MAJOR BEEF PRODUCING
AND TRADING COUNTRIES
We used two main criteria to select countries for comparison: their importance in terms of world production and trade, and their experience with adoption of traceability systems in the beef supply chain. Table 1 compares the countries selected in terms of beef and veal production, exports, and imports. The United States and the European Union are both large producers and traders of beef. Australia, Canada, and, increasingly, Brazil export a large portion of their total production, while Argentina is a smaller exporter. Japan is a very important importer of beef. As discussed below, levels of exports and imports, as well as the size of domestic beef markets, have an important influence on the introduction of traceability systems.
Four patterns of adoption are evident in the major producing and trading countries studied: adoption of mandatory systems in response to consumer concerns (EU and Japan), imposition of mandatory traceability to maintain or enhance export market shares (Australia, Brazil, and Argentina), industry managed mandatory programs for animal identification (Canada), and voluntary systems (United States). Table 2 provides an overall comparison of the systems described.
0/5000
From: -
To: -
Results (Indonesian) 1: [Copy]
Copied!
TRACEABILITY SYSTEMS IN THE MAJOR BEEF PRODUCINGAND TRADING COUNTRIESWe used two main criteria to select countries for comparison: their importance in terms of world production and trade, and their experience with adoption of traceability systems in the beef supply chain. Table 1 compares the countries selected in terms of beef and veal production, exports, and imports. The United States and the European Union are both large producers and traders of beef. Australia, Canada, and, increasingly, Brazil export a large portion of their total production, while Argentina is a smaller exporter. Japan is a very important importer of beef. As discussed below, levels of exports and imports, as well as the size of domestic beef markets, have an important influence on the introduction of traceability systems.Four patterns of adoption are evident in the major producing and trading countries studied: adoption of mandatory systems in response to consumer concerns (EU and Japan), imposition of mandatory traceability to maintain or enhance export market shares (Australia, Brazil, and Argentina), industry managed mandatory programs for animal identification (Canada), and voluntary systems (United States). Table 2 provides an overall comparison of the systems described.
Being translated, please wait..
Results (Indonesian) 2:[Copy]
Copied!
Sistem traceability DI DAGING SAPI PENGHASIL UTAMA
DAN PERDAGANGAN NEGARA
Kami menggunakan dua kriteria utama untuk memilih negara untuk perbandingan: pentingnya mereka dalam hal produksi dan perdagangan dunia, dan pengalaman mereka dengan penerapan sistem traceability dalam rantai pasokan daging sapi. Tabel 1 membandingkan negara terpilih dalam hal daging sapi dan produksi sapi, ekspor, dan impor. Amerika Serikat dan Uni Eropa keduanya produsen besar dan pedagang daging sapi. Australia, Kanada, dan, semakin, Brasil mengekspor sebagian besar dari total produksi mereka, sementara Argentina adalah eksportir kecil. Jepang adalah importir yang sangat penting dari daging sapi. Seperti dibahas di bawah, tingkat ekspor dan impor, serta ukuran pasar daging sapi dalam negeri, memiliki pengaruh penting pada pengenalan sistem traceability.
Empat pola adopsi yang jelas dalam memproduksi dan perdagangan negara-negara besar dipelajari: adopsi sistem wajib dalam menanggapi kekhawatiran konsumen (Uni Eropa dan Jepang), pengenaan ketertelusuran wajib untuk mempertahankan atau meningkatkan pangsa pasar ekspor (Australia, Brazil, dan Argentina), industri dikelola program wajib untuk identifikasi hewan (Kanada), dan sistem sukarela (Amerika Serikat). Tabel 2 memberikan perbandingan keseluruhan dari sistem dijelaskan.
Being translated, please wait..
 
Other languages
The translation tool support: Afrikaans, Albanian, Amharic, Arabic, Armenian, Azerbaijani, Basque, Belarusian, Bengali, Bosnian, Bulgarian, Catalan, Cebuano, Chichewa, Chinese, Chinese Traditional, Corsican, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Detect language, Dutch, English, Esperanto, Estonian, Filipino, Finnish, French, Frisian, Galician, Georgian, German, Greek, Gujarati, Haitian Creole, Hausa, Hawaiian, Hebrew, Hindi, Hmong, Hungarian, Icelandic, Igbo, Indonesian, Irish, Italian, Japanese, Javanese, Kannada, Kazakh, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Klingon, Korean, Kurdish (Kurmanji), Kyrgyz, Lao, Latin, Latvian, Lithuanian, Luxembourgish, Macedonian, Malagasy, Malay, Malayalam, Maltese, Maori, Marathi, Mongolian, Myanmar (Burmese), Nepali, Norwegian, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Punjabi, Romanian, Russian, Samoan, Scots Gaelic, Serbian, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovak, Slovenian, Somali, Spanish, Sundanese, Swahili, Swedish, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turkish, Turkmen, Ukrainian, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnamese, Welsh, Xhosa, Yiddish, Yoruba, Zulu, Language translation.

Copyright ©2025 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: