AbstractThis paper analyses two fun

Abstract
This paper analyses two fundamental assumptions associated with the analysis and design of information systems:: (1) the assumed organizational role of information systems, and (2) the view of information requirements. In the case of the first assumption, it distinguishes three alternatives: a technical view, a sociotechnical view, and a social view. In the case of the second assumption, again three alternatives are explored: an objective view, a subjective view, and an intersubjective view. The paper points out the importance of these assumptions from the viewpoint of IS development through the analysis of eight IS development approaches: Information Modelling, Decision Support Systems, the Socio-Technical Approach, the Infological Approach, the Interactionist approach, the Speech Act-based approach, Soft Systems Methodology and the Scandinavian Trade Unionist approach. The first four are established traditions and the last four, newer and more emerging as IS development approaches. The analysis shows that the first two established traditions have a technical-mechanistic view of the organizational role of information systems, the view of the socio-technical tradition being socio-technical and the infological approach reflecting all three views. Most of the emerging approaches emphasize the social nature of information systems. In the case of information requirements, the differences between the established and emerging approaches are not as striking. While the objective and subjective views dominate the established traditions, only the Speech Act-based approach and Soft Systems Methodology among the emerging approaches seem to emphasize the intersubjective nature of information requirements.

Results (Indonesian) 1:

AbstrakThis paper analyses two fundamental assumptions associated with the analysis and design of information systems:: (1) the assumed organizational role of information systems, and (2) the view of information requirements. In the case of the first assumption, it distinguishes three alternatives: a technical view, a sociotechnical view, and a social view. In the case of the second assumption, again three alternatives are explored: an objective view, a subjective view, and an intersubjective view. The paper points out the importance of these assumptions from the viewpoint of IS development through the analysis of eight IS development approaches: Information Modelling, Decision Support Systems, the Socio-Technical Approach, the Infological Approach, the Interactionist approach, the Speech Act-based approach, Soft Systems Methodology and the Scandinavian Trade Unionist approach. The first four are established traditions and the last four, newer and more emerging as IS development approaches. The analysis shows that the first two established traditions have a technical-mechanistic view of the organizational role of information systems, the view of the socio-technical tradition being socio-technical and the infological approach reflecting all three views. Most of the emerging approaches emphasize the social nature of information systems. In the case of information requirements, the differences between the established and emerging approaches are not as striking. While the objective and subjective views dominate the established traditions, only the Speech Act-based approach and Soft Systems Methodology among the emerging approaches seem to emphasize the intersubjective nature of information requirements.

Results (Indonesian) 2:

Abstrak
Makalah ini menganalisis dua asumsi mendasar yang terkait dengan analisis dan desain sistem informasi :: (1) peran organisasi yang diasumsikan dari sistem informasi, dan (2) pandangan kebutuhan informasi. Dalam kasus asumsi pertama, membedakan tiga alternatif: pandangan teknis, pandangan sosioteknikal, dan pandangan sosial. Dalam kasus asumsi kedua, lagi tiga alternatif dieksplorasi: pandangan objektif, pandangan subjektif, dan pandangan intersubjektif. Makalah ini menunjukkan pentingnya asumsi ini dari sudut pandang pembangunan IS melalui analisis delapan IS pengembangan pendekatan: Informasi Modelling, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, Pendekatan Sosio-Teknis, Pendekatan Infological, pendekatan interaksionis, Pidato Act berbasis pendekatan, soft Sistem Metodologi dan pendekatan Skandinavia Trade Unionis. Empat pertama didirikan tradisi dan empat terakhir, lebih baru dan lebih muncul sebagai IS pendekatan pembangunan. Analisis menunjukkan bahwa dua tradisi didirikan pertama memiliki pandangan teknis-mekanistik tentang peran organisasi sistem informasi, pandangan tradisi sosio-teknis menjadi sosio-teknis dan pendekatan infological mencerminkan semua tiga tampilan. Sebagian besar pendekatan yang muncul menekankan sifat sosial dari sistem informasi. Dalam kasus kebutuhan informasi, perbedaan antara pendekatan didirikan dan muncul yang tidak mencolok. Sementara pandangan objektif dan subjektif mendominasi tradisi didirikan, hanya pendekatan berbasis Act Speech dan Soft Sistem Metodologi antara pendekatan yang muncul tampaknya menekankan sifat intersubjektif dari kebutuhan informasi.