The artist list has no objective means by which to decide who should be or should not be on the list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.9.144.228 (talk) 22:25, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
what do you think of interactivity as a limiting factor in art? ability to choose from options is lesser than ability to take part? share your comments on this and we'll have a discussion
Wikipedia is not a forum. - UnlimitedAccess 04:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
There is a fairly prominent organization in Australia called Experimenta, which does major exhibitions both in AU and internationally involving a number of artists on Wikipedia. They've been around for quite a while- 20+ years in '07. Are they page-worthy? Margotkh 02:53, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
The example given, Michael Mandiberg's "How Much It Costs Us", is a poor example. If this qualifies as interactive art, then so do Google Maps and Mapquest, which perform the same function in exact. The only apparent difference is that Google Maps and Mapquest claim to be services and not art. --GMerriment (talk) 16:46, 11 July 2010 (UTC)