หน้าที่ 12
3) Analysis Result
Using the TOPSIS technique on the six routes considering both the
quantitative and qualitative factors the overall ranks are Route 1 > Route
6> Route 4 > Route 2 > Route 3 > Route 5 (see Figure 4). That is, the
trans-continent railway transport using TKR–TSR shows the highest
competitiveness, while the most frequently used Sea transport passing
through the Suez Canal shows the lowest competitiveness. Route 6 using
the Arctic route is ranked second in competitiveness. Regardless of
practical restraints in realizing the routes, Route 1 and 6 showed the
highest competitiveness among other existing routes(Route 2, 3, 4, and 5).
Of the sea–railway combined transports, Route 4 that passes Vanino
Port is ranked top, followed by Route 2 passing Vostochny Port, and
Route 3 passing Vladivostok and Vostochny Ports.
The result of TOPSIS (V*)
IV. Analysis on the Transport Routes by Each Factor
1. The Comparison by Quantitative and Qualitative Factors
In this section, the routes analyzed and ranked in two ways: (1) by
considering the quantitative factors only and (2) by considering the
qualitative factors only. Firstly, competitiveness analysis of the routes by
considering only the quantitative factors ranked the routes in the order of