After used methods indicated that the time students spend on campus and the characteristics of their involvement in activities have potential impact on the quality of their campus-wide experiences, student development of leadership has been viewed as one of the most important tasks. According to Astin’s involvement theory, there were five basic postulates: 1. Involvement refer to the investment of physical and psychological energy in various objects. The objects maybe highly generalized (the student experience) or highly specific. 2. Regardless of its object, involvement occurs along a continuum; that is, different students manifest different degrees of involvement in a given object, and the same student manifests different degrees of involvement in different objects at different times. 3. Involvement has both quantitative and qualitative features. The extent of a student’s involvement in academic work, for instance, can be measured quantitatively (how many hours the student spends studying) and qualitatively (whether the student reviews and comprehends reading assignments or simply stares at the text book and daydreams). 4. The amount of student learning and personal development associated with any educational program is directly proportional to the quality and quantity of student involvement in that program. 5. The effectiveness of any educational policy or practice is directly related to the capacity of that policy or practice to increase student involvement.