THE IDEALITY OF LAWSean CoyleAbstra

THE IDEALITY OF LAW
Sean Coyle

Abstract
Recent works by Nigel Simmonds and Ronald Dworkin offer a challenge to the dominant jurisprudential tradition of legal positivism. Underlying this superficial similarity in aims is a sharp divergence in philosophical outlook. Whereas Dworkin’s arguments operate within a body of background assumptions that he shares with his opponents, and which he has done much to shape, Simmonds sees his task as challenging those assumptions. This is particularly evident in the moral philosophies at the heart of each book: Dworkin (I argue) can be seen as offering a Protestant-voluntaristatheist philosophy; whereas Simmonds resembles a Catholic-conservative- Aristotelian. I explore the implications of these divergent world-views.

Keywords
Dworkin, Simmonds, morality, Aristotle, Protestantism, pluralism, conservatism

0/5000

From: -

To: -

Results (Indonesian) 1: [Copy]

Copied!

THE IDEALITY OF LAWSean CoyleAbstractRecent works by Nigel Simmonds and Ronald Dworkin offer a challenge to the dominant jurisprudential tradition of legal positivism. Underlying this superficial similarity in aims is a sharp divergence in philosophical outlook. Whereas Dworkin’s arguments operate within a body of background assumptions that he shares with his opponents, and which he has done much to shape, Simmonds sees his task as challenging those assumptions. This is particularly evident in the moral philosophies at the heart of each book: Dworkin (I argue) can be seen as offering a Protestant-voluntaristatheist philosophy; whereas Simmonds resembles a Catholic-conservative- Aristotelian. I explore the implications of these divergent world-views.KeywordsDworkin, Simmonds, morality, Aristotle, Protestantism, pluralism, conservatism

Being translated, please wait..

Results (Indonesian) 2:[Copy]

Copied!

Idealistis HUKUM
Sean Coyle

Abstrak
karya terbaru oleh Nigel Simmonds dan Ronald Dworkin menawarkan tantangan untuk tradisi yurisprudensi dominan positivisme hukum. Mendasari kesamaan dangkal ini tujuan adalah perbedaan tajam dalam pandangan filosofis. Sedangkan argumen Dworkin beroperasi dalam tubuh asumsi latar belakang yang ia berbagi dengan lawan-lawannya, dan yang ia telah melakukan banyak untuk membentuk, Simmonds melihat tugas sebagai menantang asumsi-asumsi. Hal ini terutama jelas dalam filsafat moral dalam setiap buku: Dworkin (saya berpendapat) dapat dilihat sebagai menawarkan filosofi Protestan-voluntaristatheist; sedangkan Simmonds menyerupai Aristotelian Katolik-conservative-. Saya mengeksplorasi implikasi dari ini berbeda pandangan dunia.

Kata kunci
Dworkin, Simmonds, moralitas, Aristoteles, Protestan, pluralisme, konservatisme

Being translated, please wait..

Results (Indonesian) 3:[Copy]

Copied!

Being translated, please wait..

Other languages

The translation tool support: Afrikaans, Albanian, Amharic, Arabic, Armenian, Azerbaijani, Basque, Belarusian, Bengali, Bosnian, Bulgarian, Catalan, Cebuano, Chichewa, Chinese, Chinese Traditional, Corsican, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Detect language, Dutch, English, Esperanto, Estonian, Filipino, Finnish, French, Frisian, Galician, Georgian, German, Greek, Gujarati, Haitian Creole, Hausa, Hawaiian, Hebrew, Hindi, Hmong, Hungarian, Icelandic, Igbo, Indonesian, Irish, Italian, Japanese, Javanese, Kannada, Kazakh, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Klingon, Korean, Kurdish (Kurmanji), Kyrgyz, Lao, Latin, Latvian, Lithuanian, Luxembourgish, Macedonian, Malagasy, Malay, Malayalam, Maltese, Maori, Marathi, Mongolian, Myanmar (Burmese), Nepali, Norwegian, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Punjabi, Romanian, Russian, Samoan, Scots Gaelic, Serbian, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovak, Slovenian, Somali, Spanish, Sundanese, Swahili, Swedish, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turkish, Turkmen, Ukrainian, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnamese, Welsh, Xhosa, Yiddish, Yoruba, Zulu, Language translation.