however, the results quoted here are a summary of more complex analyses in Which , where ver possible costs of the various were subdivided into several components and in parttcular into components which 1978) be expected to vary the hours operated, the distance run and the numbers of buses in the fleet by the method described in Travers Morgan MTT Unit costs for each were then used to the for Hobart). The to Tun a bus operation Other relative costs obtained were very those private bus when analysis this subject 1974) reached the same similar methods to compare the Melbourne public and operations is safe to conclude that, on private operators in