Content validation refers to a proc

Content validation refers to a process that
aims to provide assurance that an instrument
(checklist, questionnaire, or scale) measures
the content area it is expected to measure
(Frank-Stromberg & Olsen, 2004). One way
of achieving content validity involves a panel
of subject matter experts considering the
importance of individual items within an
instrument. Lawshe’s method, initially pro-
posed in a seminal paper in 1975 (Lawshe,
1975), has been widely used to establish and
quantify content validity in diverse fields
including health care, education, organiza-
tional development, personnel psychology,
and market research (Wilson, Pan, & Schum-
sky, 2012). It involves a panel of subject mat-
ter “experts” rating items into one of three
categories: “essential,” “useful, but not
essential,” or “not necessary.” Items deemed
“essential” by a critical number of panel
members are then included within the final
instrument, with items failing to achieve this
critical level discarded. Lawshe (1975) sug-
gested that based on “established psychophys-
ical principles,” a level of 50% agreement
gives some assurance of content validity.

Content validation refers to a process that 
aims to provide assurance that an instrument 
(checklist, questionnaire, or scale) measures 
the content area it is expected to measure 
(Frank-Stromberg & Olsen, 2004). One way 
of achieving content validity involves a panel 
of subject matter experts considering the 
importance of individual items within an 
instrument. Lawshe’s method, initially pro-
posed in a seminal paper in 1975 (Lawshe, 
1975), has been widely used to establish and 
quantify content validity in diverse fields 
including health care, education, organiza-
tional development, personnel psychology, 
and market research (Wilson, Pan, & Schum-
sky, 2012). It involves a panel of subject mat-
ter “experts” rating items into one of three 
categories: “essential,” “useful, but not 
essential,” or “not necessary.” Items deemed 
“essential” by a critical number of panel 
members are then included within the final 
instrument, with items failing to achieve this 
critical level discarded. Lawshe (1975) sug-
gested that based on “established psychophys-
ical principles,” a level of 50% agreement 
gives some assurance of content validity.

0/5000

From: -

To: -

Results (Indonesian) 1: [Copy]

Copied!

Content validation refers to a process that aims to provide assurance that an instrument (checklist, questionnaire, or scale) measures the content area it is expected to measure (Frank-Stromberg & Olsen, 2004). One way of achieving content validity involves a panel of subject matter experts considering the importance of individual items within an instrument. Lawshe’s method, initially pro-posed in a seminal paper in 1975 (Lawshe, 1975), has been widely used to establish and quantify content validity in diverse fields including health care, education, organiza-tional development, personnel psychology, and market research (Wilson, Pan, & Schum-sky, 2012). It involves a panel of subject mat-ter “experts” rating items into one of three categories: “essential,” “useful, but not essential,” or “not necessary.” Items deemed “essential” by a critical number of panel members are then included within the final instrument, with items failing to achieve this critical level discarded. Lawshe (1975) sug-gested that based on “established psychophys-ical principles,” a level of 50% agreement gives some assurance of content validity.

Being translated, please wait..

Results (Indonesian) 2:[Copy]

Copied!

Konten validasi mengacu pada proses yang
bertujuan untuk memberikan jaminan bahwa instrumen
(checklist, kuesioner, atau skala) mengukur
area konten diharapkan untuk mengukur
(Frank-Stromberg & Olsen, 2004). Salah satu cara
untuk mencapai validitas isi melibatkan panel
ahli materi pelajaran mengingat
pentingnya masing-masing item dalam suatu
instrumen. Metode Lawshe ini, awalnya pro-
berpose dalam sebuah makalah mani pada tahun 1975 (Lawshe,
1975), telah banyak digunakan untuk membangun dan
mengukur validitas isi di berbagai bidang
termasuk kesehatan, pendidikan, organisasi
pembangunan nasional, psikologi personel,
dan riset pasar ( Wilson, Pan, & Schum-
langit, 2012). Ini melibatkan panel subjek tikar-
ter "ahli" Peringkat item ke salah satu dari tiga
kategori: "penting," "berguna, tapi tidak
penting," atau "tidak perlu" Produk dianggap.
"Penting" oleh sejumlah kritis panel
anggota kemudian dimasukkan dalam final
instrumen, dengan item gagal untuk mencapai ini
tingkat kritis dibuang. Lawshe (1975) nyarankan-
gested bahwa berdasarkan "didirikan psychophys-
prinsip ical," tingkat kesepakatan 50%
memberikan beberapa jaminan validitas isi.

Being translated, please wait..

Results (Indonesian) 3:[Copy]

Copied!

Being translated, please wait..

Other languages

The translation tool support: Afrikaans, Albanian, Amharic, Arabic, Armenian, Azerbaijani, Basque, Belarusian, Bengali, Bosnian, Bulgarian, Catalan, Cebuano, Chichewa, Chinese, Chinese Traditional, Corsican, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Detect language, Dutch, English, Esperanto, Estonian, Filipino, Finnish, French, Frisian, Galician, Georgian, German, Greek, Gujarati, Haitian Creole, Hausa, Hawaiian, Hebrew, Hindi, Hmong, Hungarian, Icelandic, Igbo, Indonesian, Irish, Italian, Japanese, Javanese, Kannada, Kazakh, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Klingon, Korean, Kurdish (Kurmanji), Kyrgyz, Lao, Latin, Latvian, Lithuanian, Luxembourgish, Macedonian, Malagasy, Malay, Malayalam, Maltese, Maori, Marathi, Mongolian, Myanmar (Burmese), Nepali, Norwegian, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Punjabi, Romanian, Russian, Samoan, Scots Gaelic, Serbian, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovak, Slovenian, Somali, Spanish, Sundanese, Swahili, Swedish, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turkish, Turkmen, Ukrainian, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnamese, Welsh, Xhosa, Yiddish, Yoruba, Zulu, Language translation.