If there is an awareness that it would be possible for an individual
lay down the operating procedures that a support administrator may
follow and, consequently, that a probate judge would be assigned the
task of verifying any wishes expressed in advance by the beneficiary –
in the context of the appointment and the conferment of powers to a support administrator to promote care for the person concerned – this
situation can serve as a vehicle for an understanding of the system
under consideration that would effectively respect the autonomy of the
beneficiary, and would be easier to implement precisely in instances
where the individual concerned would have drawn up a testament for
support including the choice of the support administrator and the
simultaneous communication of statements in advance of treatment;
nonetheless the effectiveness of these developments remains to be
ascertained.