This story is misleading in four ways.You should have no difficulty spotting the first: It oozes nature-or-nurture thinking and all of the misconceptions associated with it. Second, by focusing on the similarities of Bob and Bob, the story creates the impression that Bob and Bob (and the other monozygotic pairs of twins reared apart) are cognitively identical. They are similar, but they are not even close to being identical. It is easy to come up with a long list of similarities between any two people if one asks them enough questions and ignores the dissimilarities. Third, the story creates the impression that the results of the Minnesota study are revolutionary