In Table 9, the odds ratios for cultural identity for each vernacular  translation - In Table 9, the odds ratios for cultural identity for each vernacular  Indonesian how to say

In Table 9, the odds ratios for cul

In Table 9, the odds ratios for cultural identity for each vernacular variant are given.
For wont and copula absence, no other social variables affected the cultural identity
odds ratios and one number is given for each. Here the odds ratio for wont is different
from that given in Table 5 because it comes from the interactional model. The most
important conclusion to be drawn is that cultural identity is significant for every linguistic
variable. There is a larger divide between the local-identity and expanded-identity
speakers for wont (24.9) than for copula absence (6.3). The difference is twofold: (1)
wont can be interpreted as highly stigmatized for expanded-identity speakers during
more formal contexts like the sociolinguistic interview, and (2) copula absence is used
by expanded-identity African Americans as a marker of ethnic identity.17 For was
regularization, ethnicity also had a significant effect on the outcome and the odds ratios
for the interaction of cultural identity with ethnicity are given. The African-American
community shows little separation between the local-identity and expanded-identity
speakers for was regularization: local-identity speakers have an odds ratio only 1.4
0/5000
From: -
To: -
Results (Indonesian) 1: [Copy]
Copied!
In Table 9, the odds ratios for cultural identity for each vernacular variant are given.For wont and copula absence, no other social variables affected the cultural identityodds ratios and one number is given for each. Here the odds ratio for wont is differentfrom that given in Table 5 because it comes from the interactional model. The mostimportant conclusion to be drawn is that cultural identity is significant for every linguisticvariable. There is a larger divide between the local-identity and expanded-identityspeakers for wont (24.9) than for copula absence (6.3). The difference is twofold: (1)wont can be interpreted as highly stigmatized for expanded-identity speakers duringmore formal contexts like the sociolinguistic interview, and (2) copula absence is usedby expanded-identity African Americans as a marker of ethnic identity.17 For wasregularization, ethnicity also had a significant effect on the outcome and the odds ratiosfor the interaction of cultural identity with ethnicity are given. The African-Americancommunity shows little separation between the local-identity and expanded-identityspeakers for was regularization: local-identity speakers have an odds ratio only 1.4
Being translated, please wait..
Results (Indonesian) 2:[Copy]
Copied!
Pada Tabel 9, odds ratio untuk identitas budaya untuk setiap varian vernakular diberikan.
Untuk wont dan kata kerja penghubung adanya, tidak ada variabel sosial lainnya mempengaruhi budaya identitas
rasio odds dan satu nomor yang diberikan untuk masing-masing. Berikut rasio odds untuk wont berbeda
dari yang diberikan dalam Tabel 5 karena berasal dari model interaksional. Yang paling
kesimpulan penting yang bisa ditarik adalah bahwa identitas budaya signifikan untuk setiap linguistik
variabel. Ada kesenjangan besar antara lokal-identitas dan diperluas identitas
speaker untuk wont (24,9) dibandingkan kerja penghubung adanya (6,3). Perbedaannya ada dua: (1)
wont dapat diartikan sebagai sangat distigmatisasi untuk speaker diperluas identitas selama
konteks yang lebih formal seperti wawancara sosiolinguistik, dan (2) kerja penghubung adanya digunakan
oleh diperluas identitas Afrika Amerika sebagai penanda identitas etnis. 17 untuk itu
regularisasi, etnis juga memiliki dampak yang signifikan terhadap hasil dan odds ratio
untuk interaksi identitas budaya dengan etnis diberikan. Afrika-Amerika
masyarakat menunjukkan sedikit pemisahan antara lokal-identitas dan diperluas identitas
speaker untuk regularisasi adalah: pembicara lokal identitas memiliki rasio odds hanya 1,4
Being translated, please wait..
 
Other languages
The translation tool support: Afrikaans, Albanian, Amharic, Arabic, Armenian, Azerbaijani, Basque, Belarusian, Bengali, Bosnian, Bulgarian, Catalan, Cebuano, Chichewa, Chinese, Chinese Traditional, Corsican, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Detect language, Dutch, English, Esperanto, Estonian, Filipino, Finnish, French, Frisian, Galician, Georgian, German, Greek, Gujarati, Haitian Creole, Hausa, Hawaiian, Hebrew, Hindi, Hmong, Hungarian, Icelandic, Igbo, Indonesian, Irish, Italian, Japanese, Javanese, Kannada, Kazakh, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Klingon, Korean, Kurdish (Kurmanji), Kyrgyz, Lao, Latin, Latvian, Lithuanian, Luxembourgish, Macedonian, Malagasy, Malay, Malayalam, Maltese, Maori, Marathi, Mongolian, Myanmar (Burmese), Nepali, Norwegian, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Punjabi, Romanian, Russian, Samoan, Scots Gaelic, Serbian, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovak, Slovenian, Somali, Spanish, Sundanese, Swahili, Swedish, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turkish, Turkmen, Ukrainian, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnamese, Welsh, Xhosa, Yiddish, Yoruba, Zulu, Language translation.

Copyright ©2025 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: