Women were the primary vehicle for

Women were the primary vehicle for rumors that touched upon issues of family and everyday life.[23] Fears that collectivization would result in the socialization of children, the export of women’s hair, communal wife-sharing, and the notorious common blanket affected many women, causing them to revolt. For example, when it was announced that a collective farm in Crimea would become a commune and that the children would be socialized, women killed their soon-to-be socialized livestock, which spared the children. Stories that the Communists believed short hair gave women a more urban and industrial look insulted peasant women.[24] After local activists in a village in North Caucasus actually confiscated all blankets, more fear dispersed among villagers. The common blanket meant that all men and women would sleep on a seven-hundred meter long bed under a seven-hundred-meter long blanket.[25] Historians argue that women took advantage of these rumors without actually believing them so they could attack the collective farm “under the guise of irrational, nonpolitical protest.”[26] Women were less vulnerable to retaliation than peasant men, and therefore able to get away with a lot more.[27]

Peasant women were rarely held accountable for their actions because of the officials’ perceptions of their protests. They “physically blocked the entrances to huts of peasants scheduled to be exiled as kulaks, forcibly took back socialized seed and livestock, and led assaults on officials.” Officials ran away and hid to let the riots run their course. When women came to trial, they were given less harsh punishments as the men because women, to officials, were seen as illiterate and the most backward part of the peasantry. One particular case of this was a riot in a Russian village of Belovka where protestors were beating members of the local soviet and setting fire to their homes. The men were held exclusively responsible as the main culprits. Women were given sentences to serve as a warning, not as a punishment. Because of how they were perceived, women were able to play an essential role in the resistance to collectivization.[28]

Results (Chinese) 1:

妇女被触及的家庭和日常生活问题的谣言的主要工具。[23] 集团化会导致儿童社会化过程中的恐惧，妇女的头发、 公用的妻子共享和臭名远扬的普通橡皮布的出口影响很多女人，导致他们起来反抗。例如，当它被宣布克里米亚的集体农庄将成为一个公社，孩子们会被社会化，妇女杀害很快被社会化的牲畜，而放过了孩子。共产党认为短发女人看了一眼更多城市和工业的故事侮辱女农民。[24] 当地激进分子在北高加索地区的一个村庄里实际上没收所有毯子后，更多的恐惧被分散在村民之中。常见的毯子意味着所有男人和女人会都睡上七一百米加长睡床毯子下面七近百米长。[25] 历史学家认为妇女带真的相信它们，因此他们可以攻击"的幌子下的非理性的、 非政治性的抗议。"集体农庄的这些谣言的优势[26] 女性比男性农民，不易受到报复，因此能侥幸逃脱更多。[] 27农民妇女很少举行了对其行动负责由于对政府官员的看法，他们的抗议。他们"身体阻止定于流放富农作为农民的小屋的入口，强行带回社会化的种子和牲畜，并且带领攻击官员。"官员跑掉，躲让骚乱顺其自然。当妇女来审判时，他们受到更严厉的惩罚作为男人因为妇女，对官员来说，被视为文盲和农民的最落后的一部分。一个特别的案例是俄罗斯 Belovka 的村庄那里示威者殴打当地苏维埃委员，放火烧了他们的家园发生的骚乱事件。该男子被负完全责任作为主要的元凶。妇女被判处刑罚，作为一个警告，不是作为一种惩罚。由于他们是如何被感知的妇女们能够在集体化抗性中发挥着至关重要的作用。[] 28

Results (Chinese) 2:

妇女是主要媒介的谣言在家庭和日常生活问题的感动。[23]担心集体化会导致儿童的社会中，妇女的头发的出口，公共妻子共享，和臭名昭著的共同毯影响许多妇女，使他们反抗。例如，当它宣布在克里米亚一个集体农庄将成为一个公社和孩子就被社会化，女性杀害了他们即将被社会化的牲畜，这幸免的儿童。故事，共产党人认为短发的女性给予更多的城市和工业外观侮辱农妇。[24]后，在北高加索地区的一个村庄当地的活动家实际上没收了所有毯子，更怕分散的村民之一。普通毯子意味着所有的男人和女人会在七百米长的毯子睡在七百米长的床。[25]历史学家认为，女性趁着这些谣言没有实际相信他们，让他们可以攻击“非理性的，非政治性的抗议假借”集体农庄[26]女性不太容易受到打击报复比男性农民，因此能够逃脱了很多。[27] 农民妇女很少追究他们的行动，因为他们抗议的官员的看法。他们“用身体挡住了入口，农民计划于流亡作为富农的小屋，强行收回了社会的种子和牲畜，并导致对官员的袭击。”官员逃跑，躲到让骚乱自生自灭。当女性来审判，他们被给予较低严厉的惩罚作为男性，因为女性官员，被视为文盲，农民的最落后的部分。这方面的一个特殊情况是在一个俄罗斯村庄Belovka在那里示威者被殴打的地方苏维埃成员和放火家园骚乱。这些人举行专门负责为主犯。妇女被判刑，以起到警示作用，并不作为惩罚。因为他们是如何感知，妇女能够发挥到集体化电阻必不可少的作用。[28]

Results (Chinese) 3:

妇女的传闻，触及家庭和日常生活问题的主要手段。[ 23 ]担心集体化会导致儿童的社会化，女性头发的出口，共享公共的妻子，和臭名昭著的共同影响导致许多女性的毯子，反抗。例如，当宣布克里米亚的集体农场将成为一个公社，孩子们会杀了他们的社会化，女性很快被社会化的牲畜，而放过了孩子。的故事，共产党人认为短发给女性更多的城市和工业看起来侮辱的农妇。[ 24 ]在北高加索地区却没收了所有毛毯村当地的积极分子，更害怕分散的村民。普通的毯子意味着所有的男人和女人会睡上一七米在一七数百米长的长的床毯。[ 25 ]史学家认为，妇女带着这些谣言的优势没有真的相信它们能让他们攻击的集体农场”的非理性，非政治性的抗议活动的幌子。”[ 26 ]的女性比男性较少受到农民的报复，因此会有更多的。[ 27 ]

农民妇女很少为自己的行为负责因为官员的抗议示威的看法。他们用身体挡住了入口的计划被流放富农农民的茅屋，强行收回了社会化的种子和牲畜，和LED攻击官员。”官员的逃跑并躲起来让骚乱运行他们的课程。当女人来审判，给他们更严厉的惩罚的人因为女人，官员，被视为文盲和农民最落后的地区。这一特定的情况下，在belovka抗议者在当地苏维埃成员并放火焚烧他们的家俄国农村骚乱。他们举行了专门负责为主犯。女性被给予的句子作为一个警告，而不是作为惩罚。因为他们是如何感知，妇女能够发挥重要的作用在抗化。[ 28 ]